CASINO DEV. AUTH. v. Lustgarten

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a trial court's decision 11 A-5023-15T2 to exclude rebuttal testimony is reviewed for an abuse of discretion
• finding a court abused its discretion by barring rebuttal evidence that \was neither cumulative nor repetitive of testimony offered in plaintiff's case\ and \both challenged and contradicted testimony produced for the defense\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).