Skip to main content
N.D. New York· 1/2/2013

Casey v. Citibank, N.A.

Citations

  • 915 F. Supp. 2d 255
  • 2013 WL 11901
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding it premature on motion to dismiss to determine whether mortgage agreements cover the relevant subject matter of plaintiffs’ unjust enrichment claim
  • finding similar argument “unpersuasive as Casey alleges Firstlnsure received a commission from the flood insurance MidFirst force-placed on his property. Thus, albeit indirectly, Firstlnsure received a benefit from Casey’s escrow funds or increased indebtedness”
  • kickback scheme would likely mislead a reasonable consumer as to the amount of flood insurance he was required to maintain under the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hurd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.