Skip to main content
· 11/24/1967

Casella v. Casella

Citations

  • 256 Cal. App. 2d 312
  • 64 Cal. Rptr. 259
  • 1967 Cal. App. LEXIS 1857

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • A’s fraudulent inducement of B to convey B’s interest in joint tenancy to A and thus destroy the joint tenancy held void
  • where one joint tenant has been induced fraudulently to convey his interest in the joint tenancy to his co-joint tenant, such an act does not destroy the joint tenancy unities; the status of the title remains as it was before the execution of the deed-joint tenancy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.