Guardian. of Halpert v. Rosenbloom, Pa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the lack of a transcript did not preclude appellate review because the order was fundamentally erroneous on its face for failing to make express findings concerning the Rowe factors”
• noting that Rowe findings are mandatory and where an order lacks such findings, the lack of a transcript does not preclude appellate review because reversible error is apparent on the face of the order
• reversing and remanding attorneys' fees award despite lack of transcript where order failed to contain findings as to the hourly rate or the number of hours reasonably expended
• stating that Rowe findings are mandatory
• stating that Rowe [1] findings are mandatory
• noting that Rowe findings are mandatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).