Skip to main content
· 8/3/1976

Cascade Electric Co. v. Rice

Citations

  • 245 N.W.2d 774
  • 70 Mich. App. 420
  • 1976 Mich. App. LEXIS 864

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding rule that express contract bars unjust enrichment claim “does not apply . . . where recovery is sought for items not contemplated in the original contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quinnell, Gillis, Kaufman, Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.