Jarosz v. Caesar Realty, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing recovery for unjust enrichment, notwithstanding a change order provision, “because defendants were aware of and authorized changes . . . [and] had either waived th[e] [change order] requirement . . . or [the] requirement did not extend to extra work”
• allowing recovery for unjust enrichment, notwithstanding a change order provision, “because defendants were aware of and authorized changes . . . [and] had either waived th[e] [change order] requirement . . . or [the] requirement did not extend to extra work”
• commercial construction contract required written change orders; court held that (1) this did not bar quantum meruit relief where contracting owners “were aware of and authorized changes and were benefitted by” the extra services; and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).