Cary Michael Lambrix v. Harry K. Singletary

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• counsel’s performance not deficient for failing to investigate and introduce evidence of petitioner’s childhood abuse where extensive investigation into mitigating evidence produced no evidence of childhood abuse
• Without evidence of continued coercion, the court cannot assume petitioner’s “apparent acquiescence to a trial strategy in which he did not testify was anything but voluntary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).