Cary Michael Lambrix v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the district court’s denial of Lambrix’s motion for substitute counsel and denying his assertion that he was entitled to raise procedurally-defaulted claims in a successive § 2254 habeas petition based on Martinez v. Ryan, 132 S. Ct. 1309 (2012)
• Martinez has no application to section 2244(d)’s time limit on petition for relief under section 2254
• “Substitu- tion of that federally-appointed counsel is warranted only when it would serve ‘the interests of justice.’” (quoting Martel, 565 U.S. at 658)
• “Martinez does not alter the statutory bar against filing untimely § 2554 petitions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).