Skip to main content
· 6/2/2005

Cartier v. Symbolix, Inc.

Citations

  • 386 F. Supp. 2d 354
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10841
  • 2005 WL 1330786

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering nearly identical facts and finding diamond encrusted, stainless steel Cartier watches to constitute trademark counterfeiting under Section 32 of the Larham Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.