Skip to main content

Carter v. State

Citations

  • 709 S.E.2d 223
  • 289 Ga. 51
  • 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 774
  • 2011 Ga. LEXIS 253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no error in excluding indictment from evidence, even where party ultimately convicted, because “[a]n indictment represents only accusations against a defendant, and is not in itself a conviction”
  • no error in excluding indictment from evidence, even 16 where party ultimately convicted, because “[a]n indictment represents only accusations against a defendant, and is not in itself a conviction.”
  • circumstantial evidence showing that defendant matched eyewitness’s description of one of the two gunmen and defendant’s fingerprints were found on the outside of the car used in the crimes was sufficient to support his convictions
  • “[B]ecause [the appellant] did not raise any ineffectiveness claims in his motion for new trial, despite the fact that he had new appellate counsel before filing his amended motion for new trial, he has waived these contentions on appeal.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.