Carter v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing post-conviction relief movant to cure failure to sign original pro se motion after expiration of time period under Rule 29.15 for the filing of a pro se motion, even though, at the time, Rule 29.15’s time deadlines were treated as jurisdictional
• allowing post-conviction relief movant to cure failure to sign original pro se motion after expiration of time period under Rule 29.15 for the filing of a pro se motion, even though, at the time, Rule 29.15's time deadlines were treated as jurisdictional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Price v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2014-02-25· cited 133×
• Hensel v. American Air Network, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2006-04-25· cited 8×
• Conard v. Engel
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2008-10-21· cited 2×
• In Re Estate of Conard
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2008-10-21· cited 1×
• Clayton Dean Price v. State of Missouri
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2014-02-25
• Julie Mae Kirk v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2019-12-17

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2003-04-22· cited 40×
• Nicholson v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2004-12-21· cited 29×
• State v. Carter
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2002-03-28· cited 14×
• Wallingford v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2004-04-27· cited 12×