Skip to main content

Carter v. State

Citations

  • 454 So. 2d 739

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the activities of the driver in the lawfully parked vehicle—looking to the front and back of the vehicle and bending toward the middle of the front seat—were \at least equally consistent with noncriminal activity\
  • holding that investigative detention was not justified where officers made only brief observations of conduct that was at least equally consistent with noncriminal activity, leading them to “feel,” “suspect,” or “believe” that criminal activity might be afoot
  • concluding that where appellant's conduct \was at least equally consistent with noncriminal activity\ and where officers admitted they had a bare suspicion that appellant was engaging in unlawful activity, there was no founded suspicion to justify an investigatory stop
  • vehicle in parking lot of an open business
  • an investigatory detention without founded or reasonable suspicion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boardman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.