Carter v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Holloway applied where defense counsel sought to withdraw because the prosecution had levied allegations of attorney misconduct against defense counsel
• holding that the trial court knew or should have known “a potential conflict of interest clearly existed” after defense counsel represented that his ability to represent the defendant had been seriously compromised
• holding that where defense counsel’s motion to withdraw specifically alleges that the ability to represent a client has been seriously compromised, the trial court knew or should have known “a potential conflict of interest clearly existed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2011-06-08· cited 18×
• Jarrod Antonio Spence v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2012-07-10· cited 13×
• Mickens v. Greene
  E.D. Virginia· 1999-11-05· cited 13×
• Webb v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-05-02· cited 6×
• Carter v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-03-09· cited 6×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Cuyler v. Sullivan
  Supreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,389×
• Holloway v. Arkansas
  Supreme Court· 1978-04-03· cited 2,478×
• Wood v. Georgia
  Supreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 1,161×
• Dowell v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-01-06· cited 17×