District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 10/24/1986
Carter v. Carter
Citations
- 516 A.2d 917
- 1986 D.C. App. LEXIS 468
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding open the possibility that the partition statute \might lend itself to flexibility” to take into account \the financial and other circumstances of the cotenants”
- commencement of property action in Civil Division after completion of divorce action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steadman, Belson, Rogers, Stead-Man
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Robinson v. EvansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-02-17· cited 25×
- Arthur v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-09-09· cited 16×
- Farmer v. FarmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-06-05· cited 13×
- Johnson v. Capital City Mortgage Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-01-21· cited 10×
- Estate of Reap v. MalloyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-04-01· cited 5×
- Johnston v. HundleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-01-28· cited 4×
- Ballard v. DornicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-06-28· cited 4×
- Shvartser v. LekserDistrict of Columbia· 2017-07-05· cited 3×
- Willa v. Ford v. Frederick L. Ford & Todd & Sheppard Partners, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-09-04· cited 2×
- District of Columbia v. GramkowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-12-24· cited 2×
- Davis v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-05-29· cited 1×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ripp v. RippAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1971-12-13· cited 85×
- Newman v. ChaseSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1976-05-18· cited 84×
- Ripp v. RippNew York Court of Appeals· 1973-04-26· cited 77×
- Andrade v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-05-14· cited 61×
- Chesmore v. ChesmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1971-04-20· cited 49×
- Leftwich v. LeftwichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-02-05· cited 42×
- Willard v. WillardSupreme Court· 1892-05-02· cited 30×
- Heldt v. HeldtIllinois Supreme Court· 1963-09-27· cited 30×
- Randall E. Sebold, Sr. v. Irene H. SeboldD.C. Circuit· 1971-02-12· cited 29×
- Benvenuto v. BenvenutoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-06-30· cited 27×
- Hazel Cobb v. Pete GilmerD.C. Circuit· 1966-07-11· cited 19×
- Lundregan v. LundreganDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1962-01-08· cited 17×
- Travis v. BensonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-07-14· cited 17×
- Zapata v. ZapataDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-10-29· cited 16×
- Shell Oil Company, a Corporation v. A. A. Seeligson, Jr.Tenth Circuit· 1955-02-28· cited 13×
- Finch v. FinchDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1977-10-06· cited 13×
- Hassell v. WorkmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1953-07-07· cited 12×
- Hairston v. HairstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-01-12· cited 12×
- Carter v. Weowna Beach Community Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1967-06-22· cited 10×
- Quarles v. QuarlesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-03-12· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.