District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 6/30/1978
Benvenuto v. Benvenuto
Citations
- 389 A.2d 795
- 1978 D.C. App. LEXIS 475
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “One factor which may be considered in determining the needs of the child is the standard of living which the child would have enjoyed had the marriage not been dissolved.”
- child support award by the court in a divorce proceeding
- child support award by the court in a divorce proceeding
- adjusting property rights incident to divorce
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kern, Nebeker, Harris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hackes v. HackesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-06-17· cited 54×
- Leftwich v. LeftwichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-02-05· cited 42×
- Mims v. MimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-12-09· cited 32×
- Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-10-13· cited 32×
- Cooper v. CooperDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-02-15· cited 29×
- Galbis v. NadalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-06-10· cited 20×
- Murville v. MurvilleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-07-28· cited 20×
- East v. EastDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-02-05· cited 17×
- Carter v. CarterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-10-24· cited 15×
- Cyrus v. MondesirDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-10-07· cited 15×
- Dews v. DewsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-11-04· cited 14×
- Bowser v. BowserDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-10-07· cited 13×
- Guyton v. GuytonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-02-14· cited 11×
- Barnes v. ShermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-08-24· cited 10×
- Powell v. PowellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-02-11· cited 8×
- Portlock v. PortlockDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-11-26· cited 8×
- Broadwater v. BroadwaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-07-26· cited 7×
- Nevarez v. NevarezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-06-03· cited 6×
- Cottman v. CottmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-09-08· cited 4×
- Ballard v. DornicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-06-28· cited 4×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re Hampden Valley Construction Co.Supreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 73×
- Hamilton Ex Rel. Hamilton v. HamiltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1968-11-12· cited 38×
- Mumma v. MummaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1971-08-06· cited 33×
- Randall E. Sebold, Sr. v. Irene H. SeboldD.C. Circuit· 1971-02-12· cited 29×
- Schneider v. SchneiderD.C. Circuit· 1944-03-13· cited 28×
- Lanahan v. NeviusDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1974-04-05· cited 26×
- Smith v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1975-09-10· cited 19×
- Blumenthal v. BlumenthalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1959-11-04· cited 18×
- Payton v. PaytonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1963-02-08· cited 18×
- Lundregan v. LundreganDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1962-01-08· cited 17×
- Travis v. BensonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-07-14· cited 17×
- Truslow v. TruslowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1965-08-25· cited 17×
- Wood v. WoodDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-07-14· cited 13×
- Hales v. HalesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1965-03-11· cited 13×
- Dawson v. DawsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1963-07-31· cited 12×
- Campbell v. CampbellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-02-27· cited 11×
- Grand v. GrandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1960-08-25· cited 11×
- King v. KingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1972-01-24· cited 11×
- Grasty v. GrastyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1973-03-29· cited 11×
- Quarles v. QuarlesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-03-12· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.