Carter v. Brodrick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that hearing is not required in custody cases where there is no showing of changed circumstances
• explaining that court has discretion to deny hearing where there is no showing of changed circumstances or of alteration in best interests of child
• explaining that hearing is not required in custody cases where there is no showing of changed circumstances
• denying an evi-dentiary hearing where father makes prima facie showing of changed circumstances is an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• C.R.B. v. C.C.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1998-05-29· cited 57×
• Morino v. Swayman
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1999-01-15· cited 37×
• J.L.P. v. V.L.A.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2001-09-14· cited 30×
• State v. Albert
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1995-06-23· cited 22×
• Nelson v. Jones
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1997-09-05· cited 10×
• Crb v. Cc
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1998-05-29· cited 2×
• Jlp v. Vla
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2001-09-14

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• S.N.E. v. R.L.B.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1985-05-10· cited 86×
• Veazey v. Veazey
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1977-02-16· cited 67×
• Deivert v. Oseira
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1981-05-22· cited 49×
• Carter v. Brodrick
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1982-05-14· cited 47×
• Lacy v. Lacy
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1976-08-20· cited 30×
• Hermosillo v. Hermosillo
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1990-09-07· cited 24×