Carter v. Arkansas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “public school employees” and “state employees” were not similarly situated in a lawsuit challenging the amount of employer health-insurance contributions because “the two groups ha[d] different employers”
• holding that two employees were not similarly situated because they had different employers
• “[T]o state an equal protection claim, appellant must have established that he was treated differently from others similarly situated to him.”
• dismissal for failure to state a claim is reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).