Skip to main content
· 6/17/2005

Alpharma, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Pennfield Oil Company, Doing Business as Pennfield Animal Health, a Nebraska Corporation

Citations

  • 411 F.3d 934
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 11550
  • 2005 WL 1412957

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting in response to plaintiffs lawsuit against it, the FDA filed a stipulation stating it lacked any record of approving the defendant’s product for the uses in question
  • refusing to refer issue to agency as issue turns on matters “well within the ‘conventional experience of judges’ ”
  • \primary jurisdiction should seldom be invoked unless a factual guestion reguires both expert consideration and uniformity of resolution\
  • “The doctrine is to be ‘invoked sparingly, as it often results in added expense and delay.’”
  • “The doctrine is to be ‘invoked sparingly, as it often results in added expense and delay.’” (citation omitted)
  • “The contours of primary jurisdiction are not fixed by a precise formula.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Heaney, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.