Skip to main content

Carroll v. State

Citations

  • 990 S.W.2d 761
  • 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 870
  • 1999 WL 61209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a necessary element of forgery is that an accused have the \intent to defraud or harm another.\
  • holding mug shot not admitted at trial but provided to jury and viewed during deliberations was received by jury
  • holding mug shot not admitted at trial but provided to jury and viewed during deliberations was received by jury
  • assuming the constitutional error analysis applied to a rule 21.3(f) error
  • assuming the constitutional error analysis applied to a rule 21.3(f) error
  • jury discovered marijuana cigarette in pocket of defendant’s clothes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Yeakel, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.