Skip to main content

Carroll v. State

Citations

  • 68 S.W.3d 250
  • 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 841
  • 2002 WL 124360

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that where appellant = s brief makes no distinction between federal and state protections, the court reviews federal only
  • stating that where appellant’s brief makes no distinction between federal and state protections, the court reviews federal only
  • stating that where appellant’s brief makes no distinction between federal and state protections, the court reviews federal only

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Day, Dauphinot, Richards

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.