Wimbrey v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming that trial court incorrectly overruled appellant’s objection to State’s improper comment on appellant’s failure to testify, trial court subsequently de-emphasized importance of comment to jury with its comment, “This is argument. It’s not evidence. Let’s move on.”
• assuming that trial court incorrectly overruled appellant's objection to State's improper comment on appellant's failure to testify, trial court subsequently de-emphasized importance of comment to jury with its comment, \This is argument. It's not evidence. Let's move on.\
• assuming that trial court incorrectly overruled appellant's objection to State's improper comment on appellant's failure to testify, trial court subsequently de-emphasized importance of comment to jury with its comment, \This is argument. It's not evidence. Let's move on.\
• finding no harm when the trial court overruled the objection to improper argument and the State abandoned the argument and never mentioned it again
• finding no harm when the trial court overruled the objection to improper argument and the State abandoned the argument and never mentioned it again

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).