Carr v. Suzuki Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing admission of videotape evidence of operating motorcycle with one bad shock absorber to rebut plaintiff's theory that accident was caused by bad shock absorber when reenactment used professional driver and did not duplicate height of jump taken in actual accident
• reversing admission of videotape evidence of operating motorcycle with one bad shock absorber to rebut plaintiffs theory that accident was caused by bad shock absorber when reenactment used professional driver and did not duplicate height of jump taken in actual accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).