· 5/4/1989
Loevsky v. Carter
Citations
- 773 P.2d 1120
- 70 Haw. 419
- 1989 Haw. LEXIS 29
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing admission of videotaped motorcycle accident reenactment when numerous differences between reenactment and actual occurrence were present, including amount of gravel on the road and angle of turn
- reversing admission of videotaped motorcycle accident reenactment when numerous differences between reenactment and actual occurrence were present, including amount of gravel on the road and angle of turn
- “HRS § 291 — 4(a)(1) merely codifies one of the methods available in establishing whether a driver was ‘under the influence of intoxicating liquor[.]’”
- “[W]hen a test or experiment is an attempt to reenact the original happening, the essential elements of the experiment must be substantially similar to those existing at the time of the accident.”
- evidence that defendant-motorcyclist had a “couple of beers” relevant to fault
- videotapes inadmissible as a veiled attempt at re-creation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lum, Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi, Wakatsuk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.