Skip to main content
· 5/4/1989

Loevsky v. Carter

Citations

  • 773 P.2d 1120
  • 70 Haw. 419
  • 1989 Haw. LEXIS 29

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing admission of videotaped motorcycle accident reenactment when numerous differences between reenactment and actual occurrence were present, including amount of gravel on the road and angle of turn
  • reversing admission of videotaped motorcycle accident reenactment when numerous differences between reenactment and actual occurrence were present, including amount of gravel on the road and angle of turn
  • “HRS § 291 — 4(a)(1) merely codifies one of the methods available in establishing whether a driver was ‘under the influence of intoxicating liquor[.]’”
  • “[W]hen a test or experiment is an attempt to reenact the original happening, the essential elements of the experiment must be substantially similar to those existing at the time of the accident.”
  • evidence that defendant-motorcyclist had a “couple of beers” relevant to fault
  • videotapes inadmissible as a veiled attempt at re-creation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lum, Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi, Wakatsuk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.