Skip to main content

Carr v. State

Citations

  • 653 S.E.2d 472
  • 282 Ga. 698
  • 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 3630
  • 2007 Ga. LEXIS 848

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that although officer testified that defendant was “educated or familiar with the system,” the testimony did not indicate that the defendant “had ever been convicted of a crime, or that she had even been a suspect in one”
  • no abuse of discretion in removal during deliberations when “juror did not promptly inform the court when it became clear that his voir dire representation that he did not know any of [defendant’s] relatives was incorrect”
  • no error in denying defendant’s motion for a mistrial where the objectionable statement resulted from a nonresponsive answer and defense counsel did not request that the trial court instruct the jury to disregard that answer
  • investigator’s characterization of interview of defendant as “talking to someone who has been around a little while, so to speak, meaning educated or familiar with the system” did not indicate to jury that defendant had a criminal history

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.