Carr v. Carr
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 2530
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in denying ex-husband's motion to reduce/eliminate spousal support. The trial court's conclusion that ex-husband had failed to demonstrate that ex-wife was cohabitating with an unrelated adult male who provided support was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding no change of circumstances warranting the modification of spousal support. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Epley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,562×
- Stevens v. StevensOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-06· cited 6×
- Bass v. BassOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-05· cited 4×
- State v. HemmingOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-26· cited 4×
- Ford v. FordOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-27· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.