· 3/30/2001
Carney v. Cambridge Technology Partners, Inc.
Citations
- 135 F. Supp. 2d 235
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4588
- 2001 WL 322759
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that \attributing knowledge to a defendant merely because of the defendant's status in a corporation[] generally fails as a method of meeting the rigorous requirements for pleading scienter\
- “This kind of pleading, attributing knowledge to a defendant merely because of the defendant’s status in a corporation, generally fails as a method of meeting the rigorous requirements for pleading scien-ter.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lindsay
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.