Skip to main content
· 3/30/2001

Carney v. Cambridge Technology Partners, Inc.

Citations

  • 135 F. Supp. 2d 235
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4588
  • 2001 WL 322759

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that \attributing knowledge to a defendant merely because of the defendant's status in a corporation[] generally fails as a method of meeting the rigorous requirements for pleading scienter\
  • “This kind of pleading, attributing knowledge to a defendant merely because of the defendant’s status in a corporation, generally fails as a method of meeting the rigorous requirements for pleading scien-ter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lindsay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.