Carnahan v. Peabody

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that its prior interlocutory-appeal rulings had “not played to universal acclaim,” and that any extension of those precedents would result in “a substantial, and unjustified, erosion of the final-decision requirement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).