Supreme Court· 4/25/1854
Smith v. Swormstedt
Citations
- 57 U.S. 288
- 14 L. Ed. 942
- 16 How. 288
- 1850 U.S. LEXIS 1555
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- opining that “a division of [a] church organization” could be analyzed solely under the principles of contract law
- ignoring Rule 48 and stating that “the decree binds all of [the class members] the same as if all were before the court”
- allowing representative suit on behalf of more than 1,500 Methodist preachers
- failing to reference and contradicting the then- governing Equity Rule 48
- indicating, in a pre-Rules equitable suit brought by members and preachers of one branch of a church against those in the other branch, that joinder of all members would be impracticable due to the large and changing membership of the churches
- 6 plaintiffs representing 1500 preachers of the southern sector of the Methodist Episcopal Church against three defendants representing 3800 ministers of the northern sector, after the church split over the slavery issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nelson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.