Carman v. Wieland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a successful claim for tortious interference with an existing contract “requires evidence of an enforceable contract right”
• declining to recognize new cause of action for interference with inheritance rights
• declining to recognize cause of action for tortious interference with inheritance and observing that “[w]e must, in short, follow the existing law rather than change it, and we have adhered to that basic limiting principle in a variety of contexts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).