Nowlin Ex Rel. Carter v. Nichols

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that act of leaving bulldozer running was not “something more” because “use of the bulldozer was within the usual scope of [co-employee’s] employment”
• holding that “[a]n affirmative negligent act is not synonymous with any negligent act, as the law requires a purposeful act ‘directed’ at a co-employee”
• holding that “[a]n affirmative negligent act is not synonymous with any negligent act, as the law requires a purposeful act ‘directed’ at a co-employee”
• holding that act of leaving bulldozer running was not “something more” because “use of the bulldozer was within the usual scope of [co-employee’s] employment”
• holding that act of leaving bulldozer running was not \something more\ because \use of the bulldozer was within the usual scope of [co-employee's] employment\
• simple allegation of negligent operation of machinery or vehicle is not “something more” than allegation of breach of duty to maintain safe working environment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).