· 5/5/1997
Harold Love v. Willis Morton, Administrator-Njsp Peter Verniero, Attorney General
Citations
- 112 F.3d 131
- 1997 WL 220329
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding mistrial was improper where counsel did not have meaningful opportunity to object
- permitting retrial “if a defendant. . . waives the right to assert double jeopardy” by moving for a mistrial
- allowing retrial of a defendant who “consents. . ., or when there is manifest necessity to terminate the first trial.”
- “declaring a mistrial in this case was not manifestly necessary when the decision to declare a mistrial vel non could have been postponed to the next morning”
- finding the petitioner did not \fail to develop\ the factual basis of his double jeopardy claim in state court because the abrupt entry of a mistrial by the court prevented the development of a record at the time
- rejecting a finding of implied consent where the trial judge, in a state of grief after learning of a death in his family, abruptly ordered a mistrial and left the bench
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sloviter, Stapleton, Aldisert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.