Skip to main content
· 5/5/1997

Harold Love v. Willis Morton, Administrator-Njsp Peter Verniero, Attorney General

Citations

  • 112 F.3d 131
  • 1997 WL 220329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding mistrial was improper where counsel did not have meaningful opportunity to object
  • permitting retrial “if a defendant. . . waives the right to assert double jeopardy” by moving for a mistrial
  • allowing retrial of a defendant who “consents. . ., or when there is manifest necessity to terminate the first trial.”
  • “declaring a mistrial in this case was not manifestly necessary when the decision to declare a mistrial vel non could have been postponed to the next morning”
  • finding the petitioner did not \fail to develop\ the factual basis of his double jeopardy claim in state court because the abrupt entry of a mistrial by the court prevented the development of a record at the time
  • rejecting a finding of implied consent where the trial judge, in a state of grief after learning of a death in his family, abruptly ordered a mistrial and left the bench

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Stapleton, Aldisert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.