Skip to main content

Carlson v. State

Citations

  • 524 S.E.2d 283
  • 240 Ga. App. 589
  • 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 4082
  • 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 1414

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Affirmative defenses are those in which the defendant admits doing the act charged but seeks to justify, excuse, or mitigate his conduct.”
  • Even if a witness qualifies as an expert, testimony based solely on hearsay, not subject to a hearsay exception, is inadmissible.
  • “[affirmative defenses are those in which the defendant admits doing the act charged but seeks to justify, excuse, or mitigate his conduct”
  • defendant not entitled to have witness testify about the beneficial use of marijuana for certain ailments in support of defense of justification and not entitled to justification defense instruction
  • defendant not entitled to have witness testify about the beneficial use of marijuana for certain ailments in support of defense of justification and not entitled to justification defense instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Pope, Eldridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.