Carlson v. Carlson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that if there was no authorized agency or if any fiduciary duty owed as an agent was breached, the transactions adding the name to the accounts must be set aside

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dahl v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-04-19· cited 37×
• State v. Campbell
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-09-30· cited 11×
• In Re the Estate of Nordorf
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-04-02· cited 8×
• Hopper v. Rech
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-10-15· cited 7×
• Symiczek v. Colich
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-02-03
• In re the Estate of Jones
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2012-12-24

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Winget v. Rockwood
  Eighth Circuit· 1934-02-10· cited 53×
• Matter of Estate of Mehus
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1979-04-24· cited 42×
• Ralston v. Turpin
  Supreme Court· 1889-03-05· cited 40×
• Schepers v. Lautenschlager
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1962-01-05· cited 16×
• Village of Burnsville v. WESTWOOD COMPANY
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-04-23· cited 8×
• Christensen v. Redman
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1954-11-05· cited 7×
• Hefner v. Estate of Ingvoldson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-03-28· cited 7×