Skip to main content
· 10/15/1985

Hopper v. Rech

Citations

  • 375 N.W.2d 538
  • 1985 Minn. App. LEXIS 4588

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court did not err when it decided an issue, 15 in part because both parties introduced evidence pertaining to that issue without objection
  • reviewing consent finding for clear error
  • reviewing consent finding for clear error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.