· 10/15/1985
Hopper v. Rech
Citations
- 375 N.W.2d 538
- 1985 Minn. App. LEXIS 4588
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the district court did not err when it decided an issue, 15 in part because both parties introduced evidence pertaining to that issue without objection
- reviewing consent finding for clear error
- reviewing consent finding for clear error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Heard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.