Carlos Conde Quevedo v. William Barr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the petitioner failed to establish that Guatemalans who report the criminal activity of gangs to the police constitute a cognizable particular social group
• deciding that the petitioner’s evidence failed to establish that individuals who report gang violence are a distinct social group
• concluding that a proposed social group of witnesses who reported crimes to police lacked social distinction
• holding that a PSG “is not cognizable” when it lacks “society-specific evidence of social distinction”
• concluding that petitioner’s PSG of “persons who report the criminal activity of gangs to the police” was not cognizable
• holding that the BIA’s determination as to social distinction is reviewed for substantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).