Carlisle v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the trial court “took action to limit the jury’s awareness of the shackles”
• noting that the trial court “took action to limit the jury’s awareness of the shackles”
• “While the trial court erred in requiring Mr. Carlisle to be shackled in the jury’s presence, the error was harmless.”
• “While the trial court erred in requiring Mr. Carlisle to be shackled in the jury's presence, the error was harmless.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mizner v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-12-03· cited 24×
• Batchelor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-06-15· cited 13×
• Mizner v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-07-30
• Robert Lee Henderson v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-10
• Bruck v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-18
• Pirrongelli v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-18

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Illinois v. Allen
  Supreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×
• State v. DiGuilio
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
• Holbrook v. Flynn
  Supreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 1,122×
• Taylor v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1978-05-30· cited 844×
• Bello v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-07-06· cited 42×
• Diaz v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1987-10-08· cited 40×
• Bist v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-09· cited 30×
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-27· cited 12×
• McCoy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-02-12· cited 9×