S.D. Ohio· 11/21/2007
CareToLive v. Von Eschenbach
Citations
- 525 F. Supp. 2d 938
- 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87606
- 2007 WL 4190722
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a letter requesting further information before approving a license application was not final because it was not the consummation of the agency's decision-making process, which process was ongoing
- the United States may not be sued without its consent, and consent is a prerequisite for jurisdiction
- the United States may not be sued without its consent, and consent is a prerequisite for jurisdiction
- the United States may not be sued without its consent, and consent is a prerequisite for jurisdiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gregory L. Frost
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Stew Farm, Ltd. v. Natural Resource Conservation ServiceS.D. Ohio· 2013-08-26· cited 39×
- Chittenden v. Colorado Board of Social Work ExaminersColorado Court of Appeals· 2012-09-13· cited 14×
- Kentucky Mist Moonshine, Inc. v. University of KentuckyE.D. Kentucky· 2016-06-23· cited 11×
- LaMarca v. United StatesN.D. Ohio· 2014-07-23· cited 2×
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court· 1989-06-15· cited 14,197×
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 11,385×
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court· 1967-05-22· cited 6,135×
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court· 1997-03-19· cited 3,786×
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court· 1983-06-27· cited 3,342×
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 1,823×
- Franklin v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1992-06-26· cited 868×
- The Ohio National Life Insurance Company v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1990-12-20· cited 788×
- United States v. White Mountain Apache TribeSupreme Court· 2003-03-04· cited 738×
- Reno v. Catholic Social Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-18· cited 732×
- Rmi Titanium Company v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationSixth Circuit· 1996-03-22· cited 589×
- The Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. John w.ga Rdner, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareSupreme Court· 1967-05-22· cited 587×
- Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court· 1940-02-12· cited 560×
- Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court· 1939-02-27· cited 490×
- Toilet Goods Ass'n v. GardnerSupreme Court· 1967-05-22· cited 434×
- United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 398×
- Dlx, Inc. v. Commonwealth of KentuckySixth Circuit· 2004-10-28· cited 306×
- Dalton v. SpecterSupreme Court· 1994-05-23· cited 262×
- Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. JG Menihan Corp.Supreme Court· 1941-02-03· cited 204×
- Beamon v. BrownSixth Circuit· 1997-09-18· cited 83×
Other cases named CareToLive v. Von Eschenbach
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.