Capps v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the procedural mechanism in the Indiana criminal rules governing change of venue did not deprive the appellant of a substantive right such as a fair trial before an impartial jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Twyman v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1984-02-10· cited 103×
• Walker v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1983-09-26· cited 20×
• Sherwood v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1983-09-13· cited 17×
• Siddall v. City of Michigan City
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1985-11-25· cited 14×
• Capps v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-08-31· cited 8×
• Sailor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-23· cited 5×
• Cynthia Morrison, Individually and on behalf of Ernest Morrison v. Ricardo Vasquez, M.D., and Vascular Center & Vein Clinic of Southern Indiana, Kevin O'Connor, M.D.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-08-28· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Duncan v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 3,740×
• Groppi v. Wisconsin
  Supreme Court· 1971-01-25· cited 204×
• Sidle v. Majors
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1976-02-16· cited 126×
• Martin v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1974-07-25· cited 84×
• Martin v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1974-10-18· cited 38×
• Blume, Kissinger v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1963-04-18· cited 29×