· 9/4/2002
Cantu v. Moore
Citations
- 90 S.W.3d 821
- 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 6431
- 2002 WL 2007182
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding agreement to pay $150,000 in exchange for release of claims, although source of funds and terms of indemnity were unspecified, contained essential terms of settlement agreement
- non-attorney testified as to appellate attorneys’ fees; such testimony did not constitute expert testimony and award of appellate attorneys’ fees reversed on appeal
- “Expert testimony is required to support an award of attorneys’ 12 SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES INC v. GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORP. fees.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alma, Bryan, Hardberger, Lopez, Marion, Phil, Sandee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.