Cannon v. Fournier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a tipsy-coachman ground for affirmance must be based on facts in the record
• “A person or entity that controls and supervises the job site has a duty to provide workers on the job with a safe place to work.”
• “[U]nder the ‘tipsy coachman doctrine,’ we are bound to affirm the circuit court’s order if it reached the correct result, even if it reached that result for the wrong reason.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).