Vertrue Inc. v. Meshkin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that numerous emails, phone conversations, and faxes over an extended period of time for the purpose of entering into and carrying out an agreement with a Connecticut corporation qualified as “transacting business”
• “The term ‘transacting business,’ as used in § 52–59b(a)(1), is not broadly interpreted in Connecticut.”
• “The term ‘transacting business,’ as used in § 52–59b(a)(1), is not broadly interpreted in Connecticut.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).