Cannon v. Cannon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that statutes are not declared unconstitutional unless they clearly contravene some constitutional provision and discussing that courts make “every reasonable intendment” to uphold a statute’s constitutional validity
• noting that statutes are not declared unconstitutional unless they clearly contravene some constitutional provision and discussing that courts make \every reasonable intendment\ to uphold a statute's constitutional validity
• noting that a statute will be held invalid if it conflicts with the constitution
• noting that a statute will be held invalid if it conflicts with the constitution
• stating that “once they reach the age of majority, the limitations [placed on visitation rights of parents convicted of certain crimes] put in place to protect the children’s best interests no longer will be relevant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• S.M. v. E.M.B.R.
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2011-01-25· cited 105×
• Committee for Educational Equality v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2009-09-01· cited 43×
• In the Interest of B.H.
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2011-10-04· cited 42×
• F.R. v. St. Charles County Sheriff's Department
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2010-01-12· cited 23×
• Missouri Real Estate Commission v. Rayford
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-04-13· cited 18×
• Weigand v. Edwards
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2009-08-04· cited 7×
• Cannon v. Cannon
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-11-01· cited 4×
• Gale W. Blomenkamp v. Polly A. Blomenkamp
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2015-04-28· cited 3×
• In Re Adoption of CMBR
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2011-01-25· cited 2×
• In Re BH
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2011-10-04

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Mathews v. Eldridge
  Supreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
• Santosky v. Kramer
  Supreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
• Troxel v. Granville
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
• Stanley v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 5,889×
• Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.
  Supreme Court· 1981-08-28· cited 3,458×
• M. L. B. v. S. L. J.
  Supreme Court· 1996-12-16· cited 896×
• Sable Communications of California, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
  Supreme Court· 1989-06-23· cited 624×
• Doe v. Phillips
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2006-06-30· cited 119×
• In the Interest of P.L.O.
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2004-03-30· cited 114×
• Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Jefferson City
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1993-09-28· cited 91×
• State in Interest of AC
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1994-05-12· cited 91×
• Rivera v. Minnich
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-25· cited 77×
• In Re Marriage of Kohring
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1999-08-24· cited 49×
• Weinschenk v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2006-10-16· cited 44×
• Jerry-Russell Bliss, Inc. v. Hazardous Waste Management Commission
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1985-12-17· cited 38×
• Blakely v. Blakely
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2002-08-27· cited 29×
• Waites v. Waites
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1978-05-24· cited 29×
• M & P Enterprises, Inc. v. Transamerica Financial Services
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1997-05-27· cited 29×
• L.J.B. v. L.W.B.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1996-02-13· cited 28×
• La-Z-Boy Chair Co. v. Director of Economic Development
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1999-01-05· cited 27×