Cannon v. Cannon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that as a matter of common sense a court cannot accurately determine the best interests of the child based solely on evidence presented at a hearing that occurred more than two- and-one-half years prior to entering its order
• observing that as a matter of common sense a court cannot accurately determine the best interests of the child based solely on evidence presented at a hearing that occurred more than two- and-one-half years prior to entering its order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In the Interest of: B.L.G., A Minor Child Cedric Ganaway v. Brandey Greene
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2019-12-24
• M.P.P. v. R.R.E.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2016-05-31
• T.J.W., Individually, and A.N.M.T.-W., by T.J.W. as Next Friend, Petitioners-Respondents v. K.T.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2022-12-20

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Murphy v. Carron
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1976-05-05· cited 7,357×
• Ratcliff v. Sprint Missouri, Inc.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2008-04-01· cited 37×
• Searcy v. Searcy
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2001-02-27· cited 14×
• Courtney Ex Rel. Courtney v. Roggy
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2009-11-10· cited 12×
• Cannon v. Cannon
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2009-04-14· cited 12×
• J.P. v. P.W.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1989-05-05· cited 11×
• Coffman v. Coffman
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2009-12-29· cited 10×
• Downard v. Downard
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2009-05-26· cited 9×