Canario v. Culhane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Superior Court correctly applied an arbitrary-and-capricious standard of review to an administrator's denial of a disability pension to a police officer
• “Generally, this Court would not entertain an issue raised for the first time at oral argument, particularly an issue that had not been raised before the Superior Court. However, since subject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time, we shall address this issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).