Kelly v. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that expert testimony was not necessary because “the jury could from its collective experience determine whether a bus-turnaround area held open to the public is safe and properly maintained”
• applying a deferential standard to a trial justice’s decision on a motion to recuse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).