Skip to main content

Campbell v. State

Citations

  • 125 So. 3d 733
  • 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 727
  • 2013 WL 5641531
  • 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting “formal acceptance” under Rule 3.172(g) to mean “an affirmative statement on the record, or an affirmative act by the court that the plea has been accepted . . ..”
  • declining to address issue beyond the basis of the Court’s conflict jurisdiction
  • disagreeing with the idea that following sentencing “the judge or the State would be allowed to challenge the plea agreement after the defendant has already partially performed his or her duties under the agreement”
  • noting such factors in rejecting an expansive interpretation of a plea rule
  • favoring a construction in plea-withdrawal context that did not produce absurd result
  • declining to address issue beyond the basis of the Court’s conflict jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canady, Labarga, Lewis, Pariente, Perry, Polston, Quince

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.