Camargo v. Tjaarda Dairy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “an employee of an independent contractor [is barred] from bringing a negligent hiring action against the hirer of the contractor”
• ruling that a contractor’s employee cannot sue the contractor’s hirer under the “negligent hiring” theory set forth in section 411
• ruling that a contractor's employee cannot sue the contractor's hirer under the \negligent hiring\ theory set forth in section 411
• holding that “an employee of an independent contractor [is barred] from bringing a negligent hiring action against the hirer of the contractor”
• applying the peculiar risk analysis of Privette to section 410, negligent hiring, and holding hirer not hable for the negligent performance of a hired contractor for injuries to the contractor’s employees
• applying the peculiar risk analysis of Privette to section 410, negligent hiring, and holding hirer not liable for the negligent performance of a hired contractor for injuries to the contractor's employees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Camargo v. Tjaarda Dairy

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Camargo v. Tjaarda Dairy
  California Court of Appeal· 2000-07-26· cited 2×
• Camargo v. Tjaarda Dairy
  California Supreme Court· 2001-07-05