Sievers v. McClure

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “employer’s duty to act reasonably in hiring a competent contractor runs to the employees of the contractor”
• holding that risks ordinarily encountered in a particular line of work are not “peculiar” for purposes of the exception
• holding that the “employer’s duty to act reasonably in hiring a competent contractor runs to the employees of the contractor”
• stating that the cause of action “is not unduly burdensome, as in most cases it requires no additional effort from an employer who must act reasonably in the selection process in any event in order to protect third parties from harm”
• “employer’s duty to act reasonably in hiring a competent contractor runs to the employees of the contractor”
• “employer’s duty to act reasonably in hiring a competent contractor runs to the employees of the contractor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).