Skip to main content
· 12/22/1999

Camarena v. Meissner

Citations

  • 78 F. Supp. 2d 1044
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19809
  • 1999 WL 1271884

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the grant of [F]amily [U]nity benefits is mandatory, not discretionary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Illston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.