Callecod v. Washington State Patrol

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “this court may reverse an administrative decision only if (1) the administrative decision was based on an error of law” (emphasis added)
• findings of fact are reviewed to determine whether substantial evidence supports them; “review is deferential and entails acceptance of factfinder’s views regarding credibility of witnesses and weight to be given reasonable but competing inferences”
• findings of fact are reviewed to determine whether substantial evidence supports them; \review is deferential and entails acceptance of fact finder's views regarding credibility of witnesses and weight to be given reasonable but competing inferences\
• “The Washington State Patrol’s disability requirements are governed by an exclusive statute and regulations that are not tied by analogy or otherwise to the LEOFF system.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).